Do judges interpret the law

The question is always, should judges interpret the law or should they create it ... Judges have a different job than our legislators do and especially with federal judges, we don't elect them ...

Don’t men and women enforce the law as police officers or interpret the law as judges? And don’t all of us choose to ... So what does this ancient document have to do with the rule of law? Quite a lot ...

Reportedly, the Supreme Court Bar Association(SCBA) has filed a petition seeking a review of the SC opinion rendered on a reference by the President on the interpretation of Article 63-A of the ...

Whether examining election outcomes, the legal status of terrorism suspects, or if (or how) people can be sentenced to death, a judge in a modern democracy assumes a ...

During Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett's opening remarks at the U.S. Senate Monday the judge tried to reassure people she would be fair.

Adhering to precedent promotes uniformity and consistency in the law. In addition, precedent promotes judicial efficiency: Courts do not have ... standing rulings that interpret the Constitution.

The chambermaid spoke little English, so her husband came with her to interpret. The judge has to interpret the law as it's being passed. The judge has to interpret the law for the court. The judge ...

Milan Smith Jr. believes viewing judges as political actors undermines the public’s faith in the country’s judicial system ...

Yet, despite that, President Joe Biden signed a bipartisan gun safety package into law on Saturday. TAMPA, Fla. — The debate, divisiveness and polarization about what gun safety does or doesn't do is ...

British Bill of Rights comes days after a Strasbourg judge blocked the Government's first attempt to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda ...